CHAPTER IX

Article 76: Supervision of testing in real world conditions by market surveillance authorities

Plain English Summary

What this article does: Sets rules for market surveillance authorities to supervise real-world testing of AI systems. Who it applies to: Market surveillance authorities and providers conducting real-world tests. Key requirements: Para 1: Market surveillance authorities must have the competence and powers to supervise real-world testing. Para 2: Must be notified of all real-world testing in their territory. Para 3: May require additional information or impose conditions on the testing. Para 4: May order the testing to be suspended or terminated where necessary to protect health, safety, or fundamental rights.

1. Market surveillance authorities shall have competences and powers to ensure that testing in real world conditions is in accordance with this Regulation.

2. Where testing in real world conditions is conducted for AI systems that are supervised within an AI regulatory sandbox under , the market surveillance authorities shall verify the compliance with as part of their supervisory role for the AI regulatory sandbox. Those authorities may, as appropriate, allow the testing in real world conditions to be conducted by the provider or prospective provider, in derogation from the conditions set out in (4), points (f) and (g).

3. Where a market surveillance authority has been informed by the prospective provider, the provider or any third party of a serious incident or has other grounds for considering that the conditions set out in Articles 60 and 61 are not met, it may take either of the following decisions on its territory, as appropriate: (a) to suspend or terminate the testing in real world conditions; (b) to require the provider or prospective provider and the deployer or prospective deployer to modify any aspect of the testing in real world conditions.

4. Where a market surveillance authority has taken a decision referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, or has issued an objection within the meaning of (4), point (b), the decision or the objection shall indicate the grounds therefor and how the provider or prospective provider can challenge the decision or objection.

5. Where applicable, where a market surveillance authority has taken a decision referred to in paragraph 3, it shall communicate the grounds therefor to the market surveillance authorities of other Member States in which the AI system has been tested in accordance with the testing plan.

Cross-referenced Articles

Built by Paul McCormack — lawyer, product leader, and founder of Kormoon. This site is an independent informational resource only and does not constitute legal advice. No reliance should be placed on its contents. For the authoritative text, refer to the official EUR-Lex source linked in the Annexes tab, or consult your legal advisor.